Crystal has been tracing and attributing addresses since 2017, for law enforcement and financial institutions, on-premise where the data cannot leave. Sanctuary runs the screening decision at a published price. Here is the honest split.

Crystal Intelligence is an investigation and compliance analytics platform: visual tracing, transaction monitoring and risk scoring, deployed in the cloud or on-premise, in market since 2017, with law-enforcement and financial-institution users and strong exchange and wallet attribution, particularly across Eastern-European jurisdictions. It publishes no pricing. Sanctuary is the operational alternative with the number on the page: $199 a month for 1,000 checks, a 0-100 score on every one, 12 chains, 20+ intelligence sources, and API, monitoring, cases and a signed audit trail in the same tier.
Pick Crystal when the analysis has to run inside your own infrastructure, when your casework involves law enforcement, or when the counterparties you trace sit in the regions its attribution covers best. Pick Sanctuary when the recurring job is screening deposits, withdrawals and P2P counterparties, the team is small, and the budget for it needs to be a published line rather than a quote.
$199/mo
1,000 checks, API and monitoring included
Crystal: pricing not published
0-100
risk score on every check, every plan
Crystal: scoring scale not published
3/day
free bot checks, no signup
Crystal: no free tier published
Public pricing: $199 a month covers 1,000 checks with API access included. No quote call, no annual lock-in, overage at $0.20 a check.
Every check returns a 0-100 score with named sources — sanctions lists, darknet clusters, exchange attribution — and exports to a PDF your bank or partner can read.
Your first check runs in Telegram before a sales call would even be scheduled. 3 free checks a day, and the same account later carries to web and API.
Paste ten addresses you already screened into the Sanctuary bot. Free, no signup, 3 a day.
Put the outputs side by side: score, sources, attribution, and what actually ends up in the file.
Invite the team, issue an API key, import your watchlist. Checks are stateless, so there is no data to migrate.
Crystal does not publish pricing, and third-party procurement trackers list no pricing evidence for it either, so any figure you see quoted elsewhere is an estimate rather than a published rate. Pricing is quoted per customer. Sanctuary publishes its numbers: $199/month for 1,000 checks with API, monitoring and case management included, $0.20 per additional check, and $499/month for 5,000 checks at $0.15.
Crystal publishes no free tier. Sanctuary's Telegram bot runs 3 full checks a day free, with no signup and no card, returning a 0-100 risk score across 12 chains. That is the cheapest way to compare the two before anyone books a demo.
If your work regularly turns into casework with law enforcement, or the counterparties you trace are concentrated in the regions Crystal attributes best, it buys depth Sanctuary does not claim. If your work is a screening decision per deal, repeated dozens of times a day, an unpublished enterprise quote is a hard way to buy something that costs $199/month elsewhere. Run the same addresses through both and judge the output, not the brochure.
Run your recent addresses through the Sanctuary Telegram bot first, free, and compare verdicts against the ones you already have. If the screening output holds up, move the desk: invite teammates, issue an API key, import your watchlist. Checks are stateless on both sides, so there is no export to negotiate. Keep Crystal for anything that is genuinely an investigation.
Take ten addresses you screened last month and re-run them in the Sanctuary bot. Three free a day, no signup, no card.
Compare other AML tools
Competitor facts checked August 2026 against public documentation and pricing pages. Product names and trademarks belong to their owners. Spotted something outdated? Tell us